Wednesday, November 30, 2011

AP Term "Paradox"

Paradox (Noun)
1.
a statement or proposition that seems self-contradictory or absurd but in reality expresses a possible truth.
2.
a self-contradictory and false proposition.
3.
any person, thing, or situation exhibiting an apparently contradictory nature.
4.
an opinion or statement contrary to commonly accepted opinion.




Friday, November 25, 2011

Thinking Outside The Box

Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" is probably the closest you're going to get, to an ancient writer sharing the same views as students of today. His near perfect use of using the "cave" as an institution that restrains people (general people) from exiting the cave. However, those who mange to escape these restraints find enlightenment, and are no longer convinced that what they see in the cave is what is really real. Like i said before, this can be considered as a school, where the "general people" go to the "cave" and are taught that the "shadows" are real and everything outside of the "cave" is false. Plato executes this philosophy very well in his story.

Thursday, November 17, 2011

The Big Question?

Life's full of questions, but one has always stuck with me since i can remember, why is it that relationships take time to form and create, but only seconds to be destroyed? For example, relationships in our 21st society are fragile, and to some not there at all, so what does it take?

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Hamlet, "Performative Utterance"

    In literature from around the world, one of the most common persons mentioned is an epic hero.This seemingly flawless character possessing extraordinary strength or mental capacity is viewed overcoming obstacles and even the most dire situations. We see this hero with few inner struggles, and from what we know of his sense of self and morals is generally just a conviction to do good. However, when we look at Shakespeare’s work we see an intense depth and attention to detail as he shaped Hamlet into a dramatically transparent man. This transparency allowed the audience to see a hero that had not yet been revealed, a hero with overwhelming emotion ranging from his sickening feelings of loss and hate, to his fits of rage against injustice.
     Shakespeare was able to depict these strong emotions and inner turmoil so eloquently through his flowery and often cryptic language that can just as easily confuse as it can reveal the essence of a character. For example, when Hamlet says “For in that sleep of death what dreams may come, when we have shuffled off this mortal coil, Must give us pause. There's the respect That makes calamity of so long life.” In this small portion of the passage we see Hamlet debating the benefits of death and how they can outweigh life. No classic hero ever struggled with these contemplations brought about by extreme hopelessness, they were hardened men who were only concerned with fight, kill, win mindset never touched by feelings of inadequacy or hate.
     In addition, another important part of Shakespeare’s language is his use of self-over hearing. Hamlet’s character is constantly in a state of self discovery, finding himself along with the audience as he makes indecisive declarations that voice his true desires and eventually guide his actions. Hamlet must rely on himself for these revelations, he doesn’t have the classic mentor to show him the way in his journey, his journey is within and his guide must be his own will drawn forth by his ability to search his thoughts. A textual example is,” Thus conscience does make cowards of us all, thus the native hue of resolution, Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought, And enterprise of great pitch and moment, With this regard their currents turn awry, And lose the name of action.”Hamlet can acknowledge that our mind can be our greatest weakness in itself, and that once confident decisions can lose their drive and movement in a sea of uncertainty.
     Lastly , a definitive aspect of the language that Shakespeare uses is performative utterance. Hamlet isn’t some mighty warrior capable of vengeance and destruction, he lacks the confidence so commonly seen with the hero, and instead must voice out these feelings he has in order to give them life and reality, to create a passing thought into a determined action. This can be seen in “Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer, The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them.” We can see Hamlet questioning his own mental torture, at first weighing out the two options, and then needing to have some sort of action whether it be to fight back or end the sorrow and pain he is feeling.
     In conclusion, Hamlet’s use of language gives him a completely different image, breaking free from the fight to the death hero stereotype and being the transparent self tortured man. Shakespeare gives Hamlet this desperation not only to search for answers to his undecided questions, but to act upon those feelings within himself that cannot be brought about accept through extreme self analysis.

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

You know now that I think about it...

Preston's class has taught me many a thing. Whether it was to barrel through a Hamlet soliloquy or write an essay on two books I haven't read since summer, I always persevered through it all. I think that has to be the biggest thing that this class has taught me, that no matter what you encounter as long as you persevere you can succeed, and accomplish something huge.



Thursday, November 3, 2011

Video Conference with Roy Christopher

Today was a great undertaking, my fellow AP English students and myself were fortunate enough to have a live video conference with author, Roy Christopher. The discussion focused heavily on how technology is affecting our daily lives and how its transcending into the future.


One point in particular, in today's discussion, that struck me the most was when Roy said, that you see a lot of kids nowadays buying vintage clothes, or vinyl records because they are something we will never have again, and they seem so interesting to us. This can be transitioned to our main topic, in the sense that, kids generations from now will look back on us and think, wow that's what they used then? Where as for us it seems so futuristic, that we cannot even wrap our minds around it.


Roy also mentioned how we can either program or be programmed. What I think he meant by that was either we can adapt and learn along with the ever changing technology, or we can be ignorant, and watch as it blazes past us, and we will never be able to comprehend it.


Another point mentioned, was the fact that older generations should trust the newer. The fact of the matter is, is that natives (like ourselves) born in the era of technological advancement is more savvy than the latter. However, we are not ill informed, we know what we are doing (for the most part), therefore the older should trust us in guiding ourselves in the right direction.